About your Search

20130801
20130831
STATION
FOXNEWSW 109
MSNBCW 37
FOXNEWS 19
MSNBC 16
CNNW 9
CNN 6
CSPAN 6
CSPAN2 6
FBC 1
KRON (MyNetworkTV) 1
LANGUAGE
English 219
Search Results 200 to 218 of about 219 (some duplicates have been removed)
racist card, responding to comments, comparing trayvon martin and emmett till, a guest on sean hannity accused her of idiocy and racial poison. robert, this is my beef with your folks, with the conservatives. >> talk about being profiled. >> i feel like there's this thing on the right where they want to own the description of what racism is. they want to be the ones to be the arbiters of what racism is and who is allowed to talk about race. oprah, you're not allowed to talk about race. barack obama you're not allowed. we're allowed. it is glenn beck who will tell us who is racist. what is that thing that's going on on the right? >> i think on both the right -- obviously on the right and particularly in the context of the republican party we've talk about this before, it is a heavily white party right now. and you've got certainly more diversity on the left in the context of the democratic party. i think the bulk of the republican base are people of goodwill. they don't like being profiled themselves as being automatically -- as automatically racist, any criticism. >> who is profiling p
debates, mostly on fox. they might even be moderated like people like sean hannity and rush limbaugh. this is not -- the primary process is not one that drags out moderates to pick a presidential candidate. i mean, look, i agree that chris christie, when you look at the sheer spectrum of him, is not a moderate. >> no. he's a conservative. >> but in this process as a moderate, he will get eaten alive but the republican party is not in danger of electing or nominating a moderate in this process. >> moderate is now defined and let's -- i'll give you the last word on this and move on. moderate is now defined by some people on the hard right as simply hating barack obama. newt gingrich said, charles krauthammer said on the government shutdown idea, as scott walker has said, as other fire brand conservatives have said, we can't be defined by what we're not. we have to be defined by what we believe and what we are. >> i think robert is slightly wrong. he's right about the makeup of the general primary voter. >> right. >> but chris christie in a field of five, doesn't have to get more than 3
bench, hall of fame catcher, maybe the best catcher of all time, from hannity last night. listen. >> and alex continues to believe nobody will find wrongdoing in what he's done, and, you know, he will live his own punishment. you heard the crowd tonight. this will happen with radio, with tv, with all the media, and it will happen in every park that a he ever plays in. he will have to live with that, and that's hard to do, but he seems to be, you know, have that turtle shell, and he can draw himself in and be unaffected by it. bill: i think the most fascinating aspect is what he said at the end, this turtle shell to draw himself in. based on your contact with rodriguez over the years and how well you do or do not know him, does he have the ability to go forward with his life, in this case playing baseball? >> well, he obviously has for all these other years, and he is, you know, call it narcissistic, call him delusional, he is what a lot of these athletes who engage in this type of activity become; deny, deny, deny, and then you get caught, and you think it's someone else's fault
to a subscriber of one of those companies, this would be a situation where they don't have the records hannity for a chemny -- handy for a yemeni phone number. it's different than the hypothetical you posited earlier. so there's operational consequences there. two, in order to do the sort of analytics that need to happen on that data, the data needs to be aggregated to most effectively do that in a short time, so with three different providers, there would also be the additional step of bringing the data back and analyzing it in short order. and today there's no legal obligation for any of these companies to hold on to data. they do it for their own purposes. so tomorrow we could turn around and any of these companies could decide that, you know, business purposes they don't want to hold on to these records. so we could be faced with a situation which would equal hi impact the types of investigations neil deals with where we wouldn't have that data available. >> anthony, i think what i was getting at is probably what the aclu has been saying, there ought to be specific, targeted requests for t
: sean hannity, who keeps the public informed and that the truth and is never invited to the white house. the other is john hagel, the pastor of the cornerstone church in san antonio, texas. millions around the world revere this man. founder of christians united for israel. he has stood for israel, and he's the the truth of the bible. not what reaches people's ears, bible says.what the people act so lowly love him. he is on twice a day, and he is very funny when he is speaking about the church and the home situation. expert on --as an he knows the bible inside and out, outside and out. he does not back up from what god says. that is what we want in this country because the lord says if my people, which are caught by my name, will humble themselves and pray and turn from their wicked ways, i will hear from heaven, and i will heal their land. he does not make excuses or acceptances because it is politically correct. and he is a man's man, but the women love him too. he loves god, and he speaks the truth, and it is very rare today. host: all right, that is margaret in oklahoma. from page of
. and you can watch tv on your flight. so i watched some of sean hannity's show -- >> bill: oh, my god. >> and it was just the dumbest issue, and then i realized that i was getting looks from people next to me. and i realized oh, crap, they think -- and i wanted to say i promise i'm just watching for the train wreck, but it is a total bogus issue. >> bill: remember acorn? >> yeah. >> bill: still, and that organization doesn't even exist anymore, and they are still talk about it on fox news. something else that bares to mention here, doing our job as the liberal media, and this is -- me, the number one critic of eric holder, two days in a row we has done things that made sense. two days ago he gave the speech in san francisco, where he said this maximum/minimum sentencing we have been practicing is really making maters worse not better, and we're going to stop forcing it at the federal level. good for him on that issue, and yesterday the department of justice said no, we're going to stand up, we're going to court. we're going to try to block this latest merger in the airlines, and, you
official government business? here he is on "hannity" talking about that. >> when she see she circumvented the official mail in private, i hate to call it private, but using non-government email accounts for government-type business or communications with other individuals in agencies such as the fec or the sec, it raises concerns about what she was really up to. bill: jay sekulow, chief counsel for the american center of law and justice representing some groups targeted by the irs. jay, good morning to you and welcome become here. >> good morning, bill. bill: what does this mean? >> well it is another troubling development in a series of troubling developments. the explanation which we've not received yet but i'm trying to, practicing law a long time, why would you send government information from your government e-mail account to your personal e-mail account? well, here's one reason why. if a freedom of information act request was filed on your government accounts, then you had stuff on your, other emails going to your private accounts, those private email accounts would not be covered n
department to investigate the incident. to the dismay of fox news sean hannity. >> really, you want to spend your hard-earned taxpayer money like this? >> they are aware of the incident but they've determined that this incident does not rise to the level of a threat. the justice department has declined the comment at this time. wolf? >> athena, thank you for that report. >>> believe it or not, a member of the bush family appears to be rooting for hillary clinton. barbara tells "people" magazine she thinks the former secretary of state is, quote, unbelievably accomplished. while the former president's daughter says she'd like to see mrs. clinton run in 2016, she might not vote for her. it depends on who the republicans nominate. >>> up next, michael jackson's ex-wife now takes the stand giving new insight into the singer's biggest fears. >>> and new clues about america's biggest secrets have just been declassified. when we made our commitment to the gulf, bp had two big goals: help the gulf recover and learn from what happened so we could be a better, safer energy company. i can tell you - sa
and they are reporting here from the column of "the washington examiner." limbaugh and sean hannity iodized moderators. they are already looking to block cnn and nbc. the plan features on hillary clinton and they are looking to scrap the old model of having reporters and news personnel asking the questions and candidate forums. back to your calls from the democrats line. from jesup, georgia. caller: i think hillary clinton will probably be the nomination that i really like o'malley out of maryland. i really like a lady out of washington, the young 24-year- old black republican. and some lady down in texas, the guy who said he was a democrat and just turned republican, the hispanic, if you check the numbers, he the president won the hispanic vote. i would like to know why the republicans tried so hard to take the waltons who spent $26 million between the five family members and not try to help the one million workers that we have to subsidize every week, every month, every year. thank you all. >> watertown, wisconsin, on the republican line. hello. how are you? who is the future of your party? caller:
, it may be helpful. we'll see. hannity is not convinced. this is the exchange last night on his show. >> this is a very salem day and we're -- a very solemn day and we're supposed to remember the victims, their families, children that lost parents that never saw them again and you want to turn this into a day about anti-islamic bigotry? >> not really. we muslims, we denounce terrorism and we understand with the solidarity denouncing that -- >> that is not what your statement says at all. >>brian: should that da be about the muslim community or should that day be about all those americans who lost their lives, whether you were in the planes that hit the buildings, the pentagon or night 93, or should it be about the million muslim march? either way it's going to be a story. straight ahead, he's the worst boss ever. this guy caught drugging his kphraoe's drink? -- employees drink. >>tucker: a billionaire betting on our economy to fail. what does that mean? charles payne on deck to explain. ♪ ♪ ♪ our most fabulous jacket collection. only at chico's and chicos.com. because all these
tell you my personalities are. rush limbaugh, sean hannity, mark levine. i always tell our clients can i say, i don't agree with what they say but i agreed with the value of the customer that they put in front of you. but if you listen to what they say, if you listen to the words, it's all buzz. and see what happens is, the people that are fans of that type of talk radio, they are listening very carefully. we are not paying attention. and what they're doing in effect is mobilizing their forces. so what we have to do is we have to make sure that we educate our young people. we have to make sure that they are politically astute. we need to make sure that they are a part of the process of making change in our community. and that's what i believe the role of a segment and a zeta and the mine nine organization did. we both of youth auxiliary groups. zeta hous has agreed. we need to make sure that we have a political action arm that is teaching our young people about what their history is but more important how they can change the future. and if we can do that effectively, we then help to se
hannity last night? >> the fact is, you've got two networks that are potentially spending millions of dollars promoting a person that they know is at least doing the dance and getting ready for a run for president and i think it's about time that our party stands up and protects the party and our candidates from networks that are not in the business of promoting our party. they're not in the business of promoting our candidate. they're not in the business of doing anything but promoting the democratic party. and i'm not going to sit around and watch this happen anymore. >> steve: he also said that nbc and cnn were hillary clinton campaign operatives. them's fighting words. let's see what happens. >> gretchen: let's talk about the privacy of your cell phone. because much has been made in the last couple of weeks and months about the nsa and listening or at least tracking your phone calls and your other information with regard to e-mails. so the question this morning is, how private is your cell phone? the supreme court may get to decide that question very, very soon. it's a good thi
talk show, i'd love to have a show along the lines of a hannity or reilly, political show where you call in and give your opinions, and i'm looking around to try and find that. hopefully, that can happen. >> host: is radio the only thing you're doing right now? >> guest: well, i'm writing a play. i've had a meeting with sony pictures, and they've begin me some optimism maybe this project could be a movie someday. and i want to make it a play first along the lines of what tyler perry did. and then take it to a production house and maybe get it made. >> host: would you star in it like tyler perry does? >> guest: no, i'm not an actor. [laughter] >> host: are you still a lawyer? practicing lawyer? >> guest: i am. i'm not practicing, but i'm still a lawyer. i haven't been disbarred. >> host: john's in west lake village, and i have no idea what your state is, because it's all run off the screen. tell us your state and go ahead with your question or comment. >> caller: california. >> host: thank you, sir. >> caller: i guess i have three questions. number one, do you have any children? numb
of "the washington examiner." limbaugh and sean hannity iodized moderators. they are already looking to block cnn and nbc. the plan features on hillary clinton and they are looking to scrap the old model of having reporters and news personnel asking the questions and candidate forums. from theour calls democrats line. from jesup, georgia. think hillary clinton will probably be the nomination that i really like o'malley out of maryland. i really like a lady out of , the young 24-year- old black republican. and some lady down in texas, the guy who said he was a democrat and just turned republican, the hispanic, if you check the numbers, he the president won the hispanic vote. i would like to know why the hard toans tried so take the waltons who spent $26 million between the five family help thend not try to one million workers that we have to subsidize every week, every month, every year. thank you all. >> watertown, wisconsin, on the republican line. hello. how are you? who is the future of your party? caller: i think rick santorum from pennsylvania. i believe chris christie of new je
blamed for the reason. you could be the reason. mark levin has a different reason. he joined sean hannity last night and talked about it. listen. >> these french republicans are always surrendering. the fact of the matter is, if they're not going to use the power of the purse to at least attack the discretionary funding, they're not going to use the power of the purse in the house to pass a continuing resolution that funds part of the government but not this part of the government, what's left? once this thing is instituted, it's not going to implode. i hear this, oh, the law is going to implode. have you ever heard of an imploding law? >> steve: no. but so far the act has seemed to have imploded on what was promised to all of us. >> brian: he's on the camp that says defund it, stop it, shut down the government. this is the very issue we're going to be debate not guilty a couple of weeks because everyone goes back to work and they got to get a budget passed. >> steve: let's see what happens. >> anna: here is what's coming up 20 minutes 'til the top of the hour. nidal hasan yelled allah ak
? >> yeah. as i said last night on sean hannity's show, look, you've got a potential situation where assad will be deposed and who will replace him? it may well be someone who has allied with ansar al-shariah, the very group that is responsible for orchestrating the benghazi terrorist attack which is -- we will be marking the first anniversary in less than a month. and the question is always going to be, is this intervention going to cause more harm than good? >> gretchen: yep. lots of moving pieces here. let's move on to the next dicey topic, which is obamacare. believe it or not, a new poll shows that 44% of americans are not even sure that it's actually the law of the land right now. so some people are asking whether or not they'll be surprised when the bill starts rolling in. here is that poll right there. obamacare confusion, 44% don't know if it's law. 31% unsure if it's law. 8% believe the law was repeeled. and 5% believe it was overturned by the supreme court. what does this say to you? >> well, can you blame the americans for the state of confusion about this? i mean, there are so
, i sat in for sean hannity last night and it went late. >> is it on you-tube yet? it has to be. >> it is already. yes. >> it's impossible to embarrass me. so there's no cost for me. >> right. >> 50 views so far. >> i danced on television. it's not -- you're going to hurt my feelings? >> no. >> i don't have any left. >> your moment of waking up, you were like, wait a minute, is this really happening? >> i didn't believe it. >> am i live on television. >> you know what happened, after we had a vigorous discussion of sex education in the chicago schools. he fell asleep after sex talk. >> because i got all -- i'm not in the debate, mike. >> chicago, has made sex ed mandatory for kindergartners. >> can we clarify. it's not graphic details. they're talking about safe touch. what's appropriate touch. and you can make the argument that 5-year-olds do need to know what a good touch is and who they tell if they're the victim of a bad touch. >> i would make the argument, that's up to the parents' discretion. it's up to the parent to decide what to tell his or her children about sex. by th
Search Results 200 to 218 of about 219 (some duplicates have been removed)